I’ve been thinking about freedom. I’ve been thinking about individuality. I don’t think it’d be much of an overstatement to say that all of us count freedom and individuality as high goods to be upheld. That’s not suprising because our media tells us the same, that what we are doing in this culture is ‘individual’ and ‘free’ and that these are both good things. So in that regard, culture and counterculture seem to be in accord.

But I’m going to suggest that we don’t really know much of anything about freedom, or individuality, by and large. What we know by those names is actually better described as lawfulness and selectivity.

Oh really? Yes really. The western democracies are a legacy of the rational enlightenment, of the renaissance, of the glorification and love of the free human being, of the ability to make free choices, supposedly. These are written as law in fact.

But let me ask you something: how is it that laws make you free? Of course they can’t. At best they afford protection for our freedoms from those who might take them from us. Freedom cannot, must not, originate from the law. Some documents state our freedom, our choices come from god. Some might say that our freedom comes from within. In any case, since god is notoriously silent on these matters, in practice the only source of your freedom is you. The law is supposed to protect that. The global society we live in is supposed to be founded on these principles.

So doesn’t it seem perverse to identify our inherent freedom, our ability to make choices, with our society? These things do not originate from cops and soldiers and politicians, with dusty pieces of paper, however much the media might like to make you think so. But really, chances are, that’s all you’ve been raised to think about. our laws make us free, and our public servants are supposed to protect and serve the laws which make us free, and the society founded on those laws.

What do I know about freedom? I know what I’ve been told. I know what I’m allowed to do or not. I know what others are allowed to do or not. I know the consequences of breaking the law. I know the system, mostly, seems to work on that basis. But there’s absolutely nothing in there about me being free. Nobody ever told me I was free. They told me I was a child, then a student, then a citizen, then an employee. Nobody ever told me the laws were arrived at by a consensus of free beings to protect the rights and freedoms of those beings to make choices. It raises the question who those beings were, and who are their inheritors?

So all I can conclude is that I was never taught anything about freedom. I was never taught to make choices. I was taught to examine options. I was told that I had so many options, and my freedom came from all those options and how much protection I had to explore those options. Nobody ever asked me if I wanted different options. Nobody ever asked me if I wanted a different menu, or no menu at all. Why on earth would I want a different menu? The menu makes me free after all and heaven forbid you reject your freedom.

and I look at these people who seem to be able to do whatever they like, and when they get caught, we’re told that these people are criminals, that they are the aberrations. But the more you look, the more you see that the aberrations are quite common amongst those who have the resources to manipulate the law. Society tells that these are exceptions, that these people violate the spirit of our society’s principles. But that’s not true at all. These are the real individuals. These are the ones who make real choices. These are the ones who get to have a different menu. And they do all that because they are the ones who are, in practice, free. These are the ones our societies were made to protect, and if at any time the laws constrain them it is understood as a real mistake and an aberration. They, and their children, are taught the truth: that the society exists to serve them, while the rest of us continue to wallow in the idea that we are supposed to serve the society, because the society makes us free.

Society functions on consensus, and laws function based on threat of deviating from that consensus. To immunise one’s self from threat removes one from the consensus or at least renders it irrelevant.

2 thoughts on “brief interlude to my research holiday…

  1. “Freedom isn’t free! No there’s a hefty fuckin’ fee. And if you don’t throw in your buck ‘o five, who will? Oh buck ‘o five… Freedom costs a buck ‘o five…”

    Trey Parker – “Freedom Isn’t Free” (Team America: World Police)

    Ah, the aberrant criminals! Where would we be without THEM? Our country was founded by people like this: they stole the plans for the power-looms and steam engines from England, they stole military tactics and ill-gotten scientific knowledge from the Nazis years later. Our country was founded by thieves. After all, England considered the colonies hers before we showed them that possession is nine-tenths of the law, and that power derives from the barrel of a rifle.

    My theory is that our society ENCOURAGES criminals, that our laws and our banking and social rules, along with the other pillars of our society (like media), are structured to force the smarter malcontents to take up criminal methods, (if not ideology) in their quest for personal freedom. The same urge to status and wealth that makes a drug dealer in the ghetto makes a corporate raider on Wall Street.

    But of course, steal a little, they throw you in jail; steal a lot and they make you king.

    The necessity of law is just the machinery to keep it together. You can co-opt a little criminal when you control the enforcement of law by showing him what will happen if he doesn’t fall in line. Then, if he DOES get caught, you can deny any involvement… and have nice machinery to dispose of your now-useless catspaw. The people who never stir from the cold furrow of a controlled existence feel protected and safe from the little criminal, and never suspect the big criminal running the show… because they’re afraid of the same machinery being turned on them. It’s all just meat to the grinder.

    It’s hard to be spontaneously “free” in the sense of making up new menu choices in our option-based lifestyle. Make up a new idea for a product, say, and you’ve got to get finance to have it be a reality beyond the prototype level. And then it just joins the menu choices, where you fight to advance it while the banks capitalize off your debt. If you were rich enough to finance it in the first place, you’re probably one of those aberrant folks who doesn’t play by the same rules everyone else does ANYWAY.

    “The advancement and diffusion of knowledge is the only true guardian of liberty.” – James Madison

    Hang in there, man!

  2. I’m sorry if this comment comes off angry. I’m not sure I understand what you mean in this blog post, and I hope you can help me understand.

    Is what you’re saying that doing things to hurt one another like criminals do is somehow okay? What about the transcending of the ego? Since when does enlightenment have anything to do with running around stomping other people’s freedom by murdering them, et cetera? I like the idea of freedom, and I like the idea of universal love and transcendence of the ego. I hope really hard that these two ideas are not mutually exclusive, and I don’t think they are.

    On another issue: What the hell is that “Extreme Individual” group doing when it requires members to have or be actively working toward a college degree? That sounds way classist. I don’t know if you– the person who posts Alc. Braindamaged– support the Extreme Individual people or not, but I just thought I’d bring this up to see what anyone thinks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s