You Can’t Land On A Fraction
![]()
Do you know what the man is saying? Do you? This is dialectics. It’s very simple dialectics. One through nine, no maybes, no supposes, no fractions. You can’t travel in space, you can’t go out into space, you know, without, like, you know, with fractions. What are you going to land on, one quarter, three-eighths, what are you going to do when you go from here to Venus or something — that’s dialectic physics, OK? Dialectic logic is there’s only love and hate, you either love somebody or you hate them
Promise we’ll get back to systematic for the people next time. In the meanwhile, one last rant on the elections, the downfall of (overtly) fascist amerika, dialectics, taoism, infectious derangments, and how not to get hooked into the male orgasm curve of narrative. And a big ol’ fuck you that I’ve been waiting a good long time to deliver.
direct download You_Cant_Land_On_A_Fraction.mp3
podcast page here
November 11, 2006 at 12:22 am
Where is the quote from?
November 11, 2006 at 1:34 am
I have a guess, but why does meditation short circuit the orgasmish cycle? Also, did anyone see the article on CNN (since we’re on politics) which said a 1999 war games simulation estimated that even with 400,000 troops we couldn’t win in Iraq?
November 11, 2006 at 4:52 pm
I guess it doesn’t really short circuit it, so much as replace it with a longer waveform that you can manipulate more easily. shifting into altered states tends to break whatever condtioned response cycle you happen to be in at the time.
November 13, 2006 at 7:39 am
The other explanation is that we switched timelines
May 1, 2008 at 3:33 pm
quote from Apocalypse Now